upper extremity functional index spanish version

Consequently, the ULFI-Sp may be useful in Spanish-speaking populations and for making cross-ethnic and cross-cultural comparisons in other English speaking countries with a high Spanish-speaking population. Bone Joint Surg Am 2012,94(3):277285. Known-groups validity was evaluated with a one-way ANOVA across three levels of working status. Consequently, this study shows that the ULFI-Sp will be of value in the assessments of patients with upper limb disorders in clinical and research settings. ; Osborne, J.W. The standard error of the measurement (SEM) was calculated using the formula: SEM=s(1r), where s=the mean and standard deviation (SD) of time 1 and time 2, r=the reliability coefficient for the test and Pearsons correlation coefficient between test and retest values. Development and Initial Validation of a New Regional Outcome Measure: The Upper Limb Disability Questionnaire (ULDQ), 2003. Two of the three other critical psychometric properties of the ULFI-Sp were both shown to be high and well supported. 0000075653 00000 n Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Greek Version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index. 0000093539 00000 n 0000156160 00000 n official website and that any information you provide is encrypted The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a recent example of this. A physiotherapist (CRJ) supervised the procedure. 0000158831 00000 n Please let us know what you think of our products and services. Development and validation of the Upper Extremity Function Scale. 0000155991 00000 n J Hand Ther 2006,19(3):328349. 335 0 obj <> endobj Visualization and supervision: B.P.-H. and E.A.-C. All authors: Reviewing and editing the manuscript. The main objective of the study was to translate and validate the upper limb functional index (ULFI) outcome measure in the Urdu language. Gabel, C.P. 9W~=;?3W :~'$RRHdP! 0000073533 00000 n Reliability for the UEFI-20 and UEFI-15 was the same (ICC=0.94 for both measures). Heffor C, Abbott JH, Heffor C, Abbott : The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness in Patients With Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Problems. 0000070500 00000 n The QuickDASH data was unavailable for analysis due to excessive missing responses. The Pearsons r correlation coefficient used the criteria of poor (r<0.49), fair (r=0.50-0.74) and strong (r>0.75) [46]. Med Care. 2002;5:372381. 335 142 PMC Bravini, E.; Franchignoni, F.; Giordano, A.; Sartorio, F.; Ferriero, G.; Vercelli, S.; Foti, C. Classical Test Theory and Rasch Analysis Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index in Subjects with Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders. Introduction The Upper Limb Functional Index . The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). 0000071853 00000 n Bada X, Roset M, Montserrat S, Herdman M, Segura A: The Spanish version of EuroQoL: A description and its applications. The 15-item Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI-15) hierarchical structure, depicting the arrangement of the UEFI-15 on an interval-level measure of upper extremity function as captured by the UEFI-15. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005,87(5):10381046. 2023 Mar 12;20(6):4997. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064997. statement and The psychometric properties were as follows: analysis of the factor structure by maximum likelihood extraction (MLE), internal consistency, and construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). 0000075179 00000 n If you believe that this Physiopedia article is the primary source for the information you are refering to, you can use the button below to access a related citation statement. Wiley: Chichester; 2000. Adv Orthop 2012, 273421: 10. Possible range on the UEFI 20-item from 0 80 with 0 indicating lowest functional status and 80 indicating highest functional status. Patient-Reported Symptoms after Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study. 0000083640 00000 n 10.1007/s00264-007-0344-7, Article Background: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 4 0 obj 0000102640 00000 n It is also reported to have no advantage over the DASH for measuring clinical change [35]. 0000122698 00000 n The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) We are interested in knowing whether you are having any difficulty at all with the activities listed below because of your upper limb problem for which you are currently seeking attention. Scoring the DASH 30-item disability/symptom section: The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) quantified test-retest reliability (Time 1-Time 2). Conclusion: The Extremity Function Index proved to be a sound and easy to apply self-report disability severity measurement instrument in neuromuscular diseases. The inability to use the QuickDASH-Sp data collected in the clinical setting due to excessive missing responses, potentially from patient burden due to being the final questionnaire, resulted in no direct comparison with a regional upper limb criterion, a requirement for future studies. Google Scholar, Smith MV, Calfee RP, Baumgarten KM, Brophy RH, Wright RWJ: Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. PubMed Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. Rehabilitation of the spine: A practitioners manual. The present study has several limitations. Google Scholar. Garratt A. CAS Fayers PM, Machin D, Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report. Physiother Can 2004, 56: 2730. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) [1416] and the shortened QuickDASH [17] version are two prominent examples. 0000070161 00000 n This study received a grant from the Research Office of the University of Malaga. 0000072187 00000 n Occup Environ Med 2002,59(10):664670. A two stage . 0000079670 00000 n Criterion validity was determined through the concurrent use of the EQ-5D-3L total score and EQ-5D-3L-VAS scores with the ULFI-Sp measures. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. The ULFI was cross-culturally adapted to Spanish through double forward and backward translations, the psychometric properties were then validated. The developed short version of the ULFI-SP is preferable to assess upper limb function in Spanish BCS. Positive minimal clinically important difference values were 8/80 for the UEFI-20 and 6.7/100 for the UEFI-15; pMCID was higher for people whose non-dominant arm was affected. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 17;12:75. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-75. The Neck and Upper Limb Index (NULI) [36] which has been demonstrated as having item-redundancy from excessive internal consistency [8] and development concerns [37]. %%EOF However, CFAs factor analysis revealed a poor fit, and a new 14-item model was tested from those items with higher communalities (, The original version of the ULFI-Sp has a high internal consistency ( = 0.94) validated in patients with variable alterations of the upper limb [, Similarly, reduced versions of DASH (30 items), QuickDASH (11 items), and QuickDASH of 9 items (QuickDASH-9) have been developed in patients with upper limb musculoskeletal conditions [, One of the strengths of the present study was that factor analysis by CFA was tested. The test-retest reliability or reproducibility was also high with the values (0.92 to 0.95) in-line with those found for the original instrument (0.90 to 0.96) [8]. 2022 Oct 26;93(5):e2022307. Sample size was determined from the previous ULFI studies [7, 8, 26] indicating a minimum of 106 patients were required to ensure an 80% chance of achieving the required statiscal power for concurrent validity, internal consistency and factor structure allowing for 15% attrition (p<0.05) [46]. Modification of the Upper Limb Functional Index to a Three-Point Response Improves Clinimetric Properties. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Objectif : tudier la fiabilit, la validit et la sensibilit au changement des versions 20 questions et 15 questions raffines par Rasch de l'Indice fonctionnel des membres suprieurs (IFMS-20 et IFMS-15, respectivement) et dterminer l'effet du bras dominant sur la diffrence minimale positive cliniquement importante (pDMCI). PubMed 0000153714 00000 n Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. The upper extremity postthrombotic syndrome score: an international Delphi consensus study to determine the score's functional disability component. J Hand Ther 2001,14(2):128146. 0000072523 00000 n 0000073873 00000 n 0000075417 00000 n ; Mahar, A.L. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. ^o_on/* G jTIr.1Urc~cz"SJ v8;' g /TF!o-+zlTuRYf.~?E=. ; Li, Q.; Sussman, J.; Moody, L.; Barbera, L.; Holloway, C.M. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies Sign it in a few clicks. Methods: A psychometric validation study of the ULFI-Sp was conducted on 216 voluntary breast cancer survivors. Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. 2015 Jul-Sep;28(3):279-84; quiz 285. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001. Results: 0000082479 00000 n Martn-Martn, J.; Pajares-Hachero, B.; Alba-Conejo, E.; Ribelles, N.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. 0000153822 00000 n 0000083070 00000 n 0000071356 00000 n 476 0 obj <>stream Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J: Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). The screeplot (see Figure2) indicated a one-factor solution. 0000139515 00000 n 0000100655 00000 n Terwee, C.B. The EQ-5D-3L is a widely used six item non-disease-specific questionnaire. [1] The original UEFI consists of 20 questions on a 5- point rating scale assessing level of difficulty in performing activities of daily living using the upper extremities including household and work activities, hobbies, lifting a bag of groceries, washing your scalp, pushing up on your hands, driving etc. 0000075019 00000 n The procedure of cross-cultural adaptation of a scale has been used in previous studies for different scales to be applied in the Spanish context [43, 44] -. 0000074379 00000 n The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. 03. Purpose: Gabel CP, Michener LA, Burkett B, Neller A: The Upper Limb Functional Index: Development and Determination of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness. Int J Environ Res Public Health. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010, 10: 161. Health outcome assessment is an important component of patient care. The determined values were satisfactory and supportive of the findings of the ULFI as a 3-point scale, particularly in the areas of internal consistency, factor structure and reliability. Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Trials. Costello, A.B. ; Roldn-Jimnez, C. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor. 2023 Jan 19;7(1):100051. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100051. Microsoft Word - Upper Extremity Functional Scale - Spanish version.doc Author: Cheryl Beloro Created Date: 11/20/2010 4:03:37 PM . 10.2310/6640.2004.15377. 0000072036 00000 n ; Kim, S.-W.; Heo, C.-Y. All statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 17.0 (SPSS 17.0) for Windows and LISREL 8.80 [47]. Harris, S.R. ; Amadio, P.C. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled. All the authors have given final approval of the version to be published. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. Consequently, a Spanish version of the ULFI (ULFI-Sp) was developed to meet this need. ; Bubis, L.D. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). Muiz J, Elosua P, Hambleton RK: International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: Second edition. Unfallchirurg 2003,106(13):19. Finally, the inclusion of Hispanic/Latino/ South American participants in future studies could potentially provide confirming or conflicting linguistic information due to the cultural and ethnic difference with respect to the Spanish participants. MDC values were 9.4/80 for the UEFI-20 and 8.8/100 for the UEFI-15. The regulation of Patient-Reported Outcome claims: need for a flexible standard. The MDC PubMed Central 2023 Jan 5;15(1):e33381. As for strengths, as far as we know, the present research has demonstrated the validity of the content and construct of the ULFI-Sp in the BCS. Disclaimer/Publishers Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. Prevalence of Breast Cancer Treatment Sequelae over 6 Years of Follow-up: The Pulling Through Study. Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI. permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. 0000005316 00000 n This indicated that the correlation matrix was unlikely to be an identity matrix and was therefore suitable for PCA. <> 0000078184 00000 n PubMed However, over the last two decades region specific PROs that represent the three key body regions, of the upper limb, lower limb and spine have been used more frequently in the assessment of a musculoskeletal patients functional status [5]. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! This is significant given that Spanish is one of the five most spoken languages and the second widest geographically [40]. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. All the authors have made contributions to conception of this study. pp. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). 2023. Physiopedia articles are best used to find the original sources of information (see the references list at the bottom of the article). https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-126, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-126. This supports the findings of the previous research where redundancy was not present but potential shortening was recommended, perhaps to as low as 10 items [7]. All questionnaires were completed and two assessors performed the initial and any subsequent assessments, but were blinded to baseline scores in order to ensure independent collection of outcome data. future research directions and describes possible research applications. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). On a calcul le rsultat du questionnaire IFMS-15 partir de questions pertinentes contenues dans la version IFMS-20. The study limitations include the lack of longitudinal data regarding other psychometric properties including responsiveness or sensitivity to change and error scores as a representation of a minimal clinically important difference. Patel AA, Donegan D, Albert T: The 36-item short form. Background: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. 2023; 20(6):4997. The QuickDASH, as derived from 11extracted DASH items, has also been challenged. ID?=?6370&criteria1?=?cultura http://www.un.org/spanish/News/fullstorynews.asp?news. The ULFI has also been accepted by the international PRO database [39] PROQUOLID. MDC values were 9.4/80 for the UEFI-20 and 8.8/100 for the UEFI-15. Jill M. Binkley, Paul Stratford, Stephanie Kirkpatrick,Clara R. Farley, Joel Okoli, Sheryl Gabram Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. This may have been partially attributed to the QuickDASH being the final questionnaire in the completion sequence and subsequent patient burden due to the number of questionnaires. Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. 10.5014/ajot.2011.000794, Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G: Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study. }Z:d2]l@sS$2fQBQE&0bNJ-%+(5s6`[RbP=u[[bl=. Med Care 45(5):S3-S11. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. Edit your upper extremity functional index online. A shortened version of the FMA-EU, which includes 6 . All participants gave written informed consent before data collection began. Results: 0000155188 00000 n 0000077003 00000 n 0000085418 00000 n Polish Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI) Demonstrates a Valid Outcome Measure for the Lower Limb Region and Joints. Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, Warwick DJ: DASH and Boston Questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire? 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015, Miller LA, Swanson S: Summary and Recommendations of the Academys State of the Science Conference on Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures. 10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80036-3, Article <]/Prev 380003>> 0000076601 00000 n Criterion validity determined from the relationship between the ULFI-Sp and EQ-5D-3L (r=0.59) and EQ-5D-3L-VAS (r=0.51) indicated a fair and inverse correlation. Doward LC, McKenna SP: Defining Patient-Reported Outcomes. 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.54073.x, Article Salerno DF, Copley-Merriman C, Taylor TN, Shinogle J, Schulz RM: A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders. Background: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. 10.1016/j.math.2010.10.004, Angst F, Goldhahn J, Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Flury M, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR: How sharp is the short QuickDASH? Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. and transmitted securely. J Leisure Res 1979, 11: 120138. 0000084442 00000 n Bookshelf The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. The corresponding author will provide data upon reasonable request. 10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80043-0, Van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, Spauwen PH, van der Linde H: Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with hand injury: a systematic review of the literature. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. 0000074939 00000 n The ULFI was translated and back translated with consideration of the Spanish cultural linguistic adaptation to provide the new ULFI-Sp questionnaire without language difficulties or other conceptual misunderstanding. S3S11. Though various region specific PROs have been used to assess upper-limb functional status, it is accepted that there is no gold standard [8, 1012]. It is critical to employ research measures that are valid and reliable but they must also be both culturally and linguistically appropriate. Functional Scale (0.59, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.67), 2. and stronger correlationswithUEFS(0.82)inasamplethatconsistedof upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions. The UEFI is intended for use in individuals with upper extremity (including the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand) dysfunction of musculoskeletal origin. J Prosthet Orthot 2009, 21: 8389. 0000078944 00000 n Martnez-Cal J, Molina-Torres G, Carrasco-Vega E, Barni L, Ventura-Miranda MI, Gonzalez-Sanchez M. Healthcare (Basel). The upper limb functional index is broadly used outcome measure for musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Conclusion . Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. The EQ-5D-3L-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is used to reflect the respondents self-rated health status on a 100mm scale and ranked from Best Imaginable (100) to Worst Imaginable (0). Conclusions : Les deux mesures de l'IFMS montrent une fiabilit et une validit acceptables. ; Beurskens, C.H.G. Physiotherapy Can. Below are the links to the authors original submitted files for images. 0000158549 00000 n The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) is a patient reported outcome measure used to assess the functional impairment in individuals with musculoskeletal upper limb dysfunction. This study analyzed the psychometric properties of the ULFI-Sp in a sample of the BCS, resulting in a new ULFI-Sp short version. 0000156965 00000 n The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. The exclusion criteria were under 18 years old and low reading comprehension due to completing the questionnaire. Epub 2014 Nov 8. Descriptive analyses were applied to calculate means and standard deviations of demographic variables (Table1). National Library of Medicine , are consistently defined [6, 7, 26, 38]. Hagstrom, A.D.; Shorter, K.A. Longitudinal validity was determined by the association (Pearson's r) between function and pain change scores (Time 1-Time 3). The correlation between items and the regression score from MLE, communalities, and the average score for each item is shown in, Therefore, a new 14-item model (short version) was tested with those items with communalities higher than 0.3. In the same study, the longitudinal validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.74. It was initially published in a dichotomous format [6] then updated and modified to a three-point scale [7]. MeSH Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries JF, Bruce B, Rose M: PROMIS Cooperative Group. Background: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. Before The chi-square test was used to show differences between observed covariance and expected matrices. Factors Associated with Upper Limb Function in Breast Cancer Survivors. 18, No. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI). Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas and Phillip C Gabel participated in the analysis and interpretation of data and were involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Spanish Version of the Upper Limb Functional Index. Results: The factor structure was one-dimensional. The cross-cultural adaptation of the ULFI into Spanish enables clinicians in Spanish speaking settings to compare outcomes following their treatments and interventions affecting the upper limb. Gabel, C.P. 0000074054 00000 n Hamasaki, T.; Demers, L.; Filiatrault, J.; Aubin, G. A Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Upper Limb Functional Index in French Canadian. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. The one-factor solution that emerged in the factor analysis accounted for 60.54% of the total variance. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor. A factor analysis showed one factor with an Eigenvalue of 6.7; this factor explained 61% of the variance. The full sample determined internal consistency, concurrent criterion validity, construct validity and factor structure; a subgroup (n = 35) determined reliability at seven days. 0000153760 00000 n Link to Instrument Instrument Details Acronym SIS Area of Assessment Activities of Daily Living Cognition Communication Depression Functional Mobility Gait General Health Life Participation A comparative fit index (CFI) was performed to measure the relative improvements in adjusting the study model against the original model. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the upper limb functional index. Demographics, including working status, were obtained at Time 1. It was shown to have strong psychometric properties for reliability, validity, responsiveness, error measurement, and internal consistency that approximated or exceeded those of the DASH and UEFS [6]. Epub 2018 Feb 21. Epub 2012 Aug 30. Internal consistency analysis showed a level of 0.94 that sits below the accepted 0.95 thresholds for item reducndancy [20]. PMC A Feature There are currently two versions of the upper extremity functional index; UEFI 20-item and UEFI 15-item. 0000074780 00000 n 2023 Feb 24;14:989403. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.989403. Adults with upper-extremity (UE) dysfunction completed the UEFI-20, Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS), Pain Limitation Scale, and Pain Intensity Scale at their initial physiotherapy assessment (Time 1); 24-48 hours later (Time 2); and 3 weeks into treatment or at discharge, whichever came first (Time 3). Factor structure was one-dimensional and supported construct validity. 0000088717 00000 n -. ROC curve; outcome assessment; physiology; reproducibility of results; upper limb. Thereafter the MDC90 was calculated using the formula: MDC90=SEM21.96. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. The QuickDASH criterion was not available for criterion comparison due to the excessive number of missing responses. Williams, A.E. Le bras dominant a un effet sur la pDMCI. 0000157844 00000 n 10.2106/JBJS.J.01744. ; Dekker, J.; Bouter, L.M. ; Aouizerat, B.E. Please provide an answer for each activity. The UEFI-15 is recommended because it measures only one dimension: UE function. http://www.proqolid.org/instruments/upper_limb_functional_index_ulfi?fromSearch=yes&text=yes, Paises de habla hispana promueven uso del espaol en la ONU. There are several regional upper limb PROs that are advocated and recommended by national associations or organizations around the world for Physical, Occupational and Hand Therapy, Orthopedics and Surgery. Shamley, D.; Robb, K. An Early Warning Surveillance Programme for Detecting Upper Limb Deterioration after Treatment for Breast Cancer: A Novel Technology Supported System. A further consideration was that the ULFI has a single factor structure [25] and an acceptable level of internal consistency in all studies. 0000004577 00000 n ; Rye, S.A.; DiSipio, T.; Hayes, S.C. 2009;338:2597. Bartlett, M.G. 0000156486 00000 n 0000158338 00000 n Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. Arooj A, Amjad F, Tanveer F, Arslan AU, Ahmad A, Gilani SA. ; Bartlett, M.S. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064997, Martn-Martn J, Pajares-Hachero B, Alba-Conejo E, Ribelles N, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Roldn-Jimnez C. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor. 8600 Rockville Pike PubMedGoogle Scholar. La validit longitudinale a t dtermine en fonction du lien (r de Pearson) entre les scores de changement de la fonction et de la douleur (moment 1moment 3). ; Tekindal, A. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI). 0000095773 00000 n Mthodes : Les adultes ayant une dysfonction des membres suprieurs (MS) ont rpondu au questionnaire IFMS-20, aux questionnaires de l'chelle fonctionnelle des membres suprieurs (EFMS), de l'chelle de limitation de la douleur et de l'chelle de l'intensit de la douleur au cours de leurs premires valuations en physiothrapie (moment 1); de 24 48 heures plus tard (moment 2) et 3 semaines aprs le dbut du traitement ou le cong, selon l'chance la plus rapproche (moment 3).

Braulio Cocktail Recipes, Zsh Source Environment Variables, Articles U